novajoe wrote:Nova will never agree to take Temple or St. Joe's(Pa)....
Does Nova have the ability to unilaterally block a team? If you are forming a conference everyone needs to be treated as equals, if the Catholic Seven aren't willing to do what is best for the league, then I hope the A-10 schools, including my Xavier Musketeers, tell them to pound salt. Temple should definetly be considered! Of course we all know that media money is driving all the conference realignment, so the media powers may have concerns about having a duplicate school in Philly and if that is the case I am okay with Temple being excluded. However if its becuase Nova is afraid to be in the same conference as Temple, that speaks volumes about what type of conference mate Nova would be. My hope is that these types of sentiments are shared only by the fans and not the administrators of Villanova.
The real concern should be making the best basketball conference you can. I would argue that The New league could be superior to some of the BCS conferences. But if they only consider private schools for membership, its hard to say they will be better than the Big East. Say what you will about Tulane, but a league centered on Temple, UConn, Cincinnati, and Memphis, is going to be a good league, and will challenge the new Catholic 7 league for the title of best of the non BCS Leagues. Why not pouch one or more of their stronger members if you can.
Being an Xavier fan I would love to see St. Joe's come stay in the same league as X. I love games between Jesuit schools! With that being said considering the significantly smaller fan base of St. Joes, I don't think adding them as the second team from Philly would work from a financial persepctive. Hopefully X will keep them as an out of conference opponent.