If you could make 1 change to the big east, what would it be

The home for Big East hoops

Re: If you could make 1 change to the big east, what would i

Postby gtmoBlue » Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:26 pm

As suggested several pages back - have the commish and Fox push for a BE/PAC12 4 year challenge, with a renewal option if successful. "East vs West" challenge... a great new start for the league-televised on Fox1, as both conferences have Fox contracts. ;)
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Nicholas Klein (1918)
"Top tier teams rarely have true "down" years and find a way to stay relevant every year." - Adoraz

Creighton
User avatar
gtmoBlue
 
Posts: 2767
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:59 am
Location: Latam

Re: If you could make 1 change to the big east, what would i

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: If you could make 1 change to the big east, what would i

Postby bingham » Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:06 pm

I would love to see Connecticut and Memphis join the Big East. Both Connecticut and Memphis would bring tremendous value and name recognition along with substantial fan bases and great facilities to the conference.

The caveat being that they would certainly have to place football elsewhere. The options to place football would be as an independent or as an associate member of a FBS conference such as Conference USA or the MAC or they could compete in the FCS subdivision. Also the conference would have to establish a significant exit fee with both these programs that have football to provide stability and equity for the long term development and growth of the conference.
bingham
 

Re: If you could make 1 change to the big east, what would i

Postby GumbyDamnit! » Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:38 am

Friarfan2 wrote:
JOPO wrote:
I'm Temple deemphasizes football (drop to 1AA) then take them if it is decided to go beyond ten. Villanova should not get to dictate who is in and who is not if the majority decides it is best for the conference.


JoPo

Are these your words from August 24? Seems like you think temple should be added if we go beyond 10 and they de-emphasized football. Am I reading your words incorrectly?

I disagree. I don't think we should be duplicating markets. If cincy or Rutgers de-emphasized football, I would not want them.

So, I am reading our words, and it appears you think that temple should be added under certain circumstances.


JOPO wrote: "I am not advocating at all for the addition of Temple or any school. Read what I wrote"


Ouch... I'm glad I wasn't the only one who DID read what you wrote...

It's cool JOPO. No hard feelings. I understand that the Rutgers add in NJ was a bad choice, and caused SHU some unecessary competition, and you some frustration. I'm glad you saw the error in this line of thinking as the link progressed. Let's all agree, No Rutgers, Temple/St Joe's/LaSalle, URI, GW, Cinn, Dayton, Fordham, etc. if we are going to expand. I would think that SLU has #11 written all over it in a couple of years.
Go Nova!
User avatar
GumbyDamnit!
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Previous

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests