BillEsq wrote:I don't see it really,
North Carolina is a power of the ACC that and they might have a clause which forces them to bring NC state along ... see Kansas Kstate problem. That and North Carolina really brings nothing to the table to the BIG market wise.
Georgia Tech? Now interesting gives you Atlanta but that state is all Georgia... and i just don't see what GT brings to the table... If i had two to choose it would be VT and Florida State
BillEsq wrote:20 teams just sounds tough ... but with those big football conferences its bigger the better i'm still trying to digest the Rutgers and Maryland to the big 10. So if there is a contiguous state clause that would rule out GT. Lets just get this C7+ thing done and ban realignment is that too much to ask
UDGutter2 wrote:BillEsq wrote:20 teams just sounds tough ... but with those big football conferences its bigger the better i'm still trying to digest the Rutgers and Maryland to the big 10. So if there is a contiguous state clause that would rule out GT. Lets just get this C7+ thing done and ban realignment is that too much to ask
Rules out GT until they get UNC.
BillEsq wrote:Georgia Tech? Now interesting gives you Atlanta...
shupirate98 wrote:UDGutter2 wrote:BillEsq wrote:20 teams just sounds tough ... but with those big football conferences its bigger the better i'm still trying to digest the Rutgers and Maryland to the big 10. So if there is a contiguous state clause that would rule out GT. Lets just get this C7+ thing done and ban realignment is that too much to ask
Rules out GT until they get UNC.
Wouldn't a contiguous state clause rule out UNC until they get Virginia? So if UNC is the key to this whole thing and already has an offer and they want Georgia Tech too either there is no contiguous clause or they're really going big and taking all 3.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 27 guests